Aesthetic surgery: yes or no

I deduce thorny and strong vexed: it is just to run back the aesthetic surgery? The title seems of an of those classic television discussions where like to the usual one it is discussed on the wrong argument. The to want to be more "attractive" or except for "ugly" possible it a normal and correct tension seems me and the to run back also to some aesthetic intervention of surgery, when useful, it seems me extremely logical. Someone it observes with horror the quantity of money that come employed but personally I retain that not better manner is yourselves to spend them. I believe that it not better manner is yourselves of to spend the actual money that to spend the for if same... and there is not personal nothing more that the actual image. We see often, also in TV, of the absolutely ridiculous persons that you were ruined from aesthetic surgeons. To onor of the true one it is necessary to do an important reflection: unfortunately the aesthetic surgery resents of negative testimonial and enough because those that would be able to be positive testimonial do not see themselves. I want to say that the best intervention of aesthetics is actual what it is not seen. It derives of it, therefore, that we have alone occasion of to note persons ruined but who is not improved. To make will stretch out to create us a negative idea of the aesthetic surgery than has not reason of to exist. Many people obtained of the large success but, how I said, actual as such, do not see themselves. It would be necessary that dicessero of to to be been operated, but is still prevailing a senseless disgrace almost that us pits to be ashamed say itself that it is held to himself and to the actual image. Unfortunately this disgrace limits the most serious and more significant publicity: the password. Us not and' attractive speech of the surgeon that is worth like a bell' example of intervention. To this push pass to express the correct question: